Summary)
According to this article, a woman who operates a farm was found guilty because she let a young girl see a dog being euthanized. In fact, she was giving mercy killing to 3 dogs which injured a man and killed a cat. A judge ruled that this situation was so violent that can endanger child but not guilty in animal cruelty. However, the woman looked that she couldn’t accept this judgment; so, she said that there was no substantive investigation in our criminal justice system and added it was a sad commentary.
My response)
I also don’t agree the judgment that she was guilty because it’s an excessive punishment. The judgment that was sentenced made her lose reputation and even damaged her family and her business. Honestly, that situation was a little bit her mistake that made a kid witness a dog dying. Yet, it was just a euthanasia, not violent killing. It made a girl be curious, but didn’t influence her badly as judge’s saying. I mean that is a severe punishment comparing to her mistake.
link)
No comments:
Post a Comment